For SRT-eligible patients with NYHA class II–III obstructive HCM,
In VALOR-HCM LTE, CAMZYOS® Consistently Reduced Obstruction and Reduced Symptoms (NYHA Class) Through Week 561-3
Study Design >
See Select Safety Profile >
VALOR-HCM Primary Endpoint
PRIMARY ENDPOINT3,6 The primary endpoint was a composite of the proportion of patients who decided to proceed with SRT or who remained SRT-eligible at week 16. At Week 16, 18% (n=10/56) of patients taking CAMZYOS vs 77% (n=43/56) taking placebo remained guideline-eligible or chose to undergo SRT. Two patients in each group decided to proceed with SRT. The treatment difference was 59% (95% CI: 44, 74; P<0.0001). After Week 16, patients were offered the opportunity to continue in the LTE, with crossover for the patients in the placebo group to receive CAMZYOS 5 mg daily
In the pivotal VALOR-HCM trial, 18% (n=10/56) of patients taking CAMZYOS and 77% (n=43/56) taking placebo met the primary composite endpoint (remained guideline eligible for SRT at Week 16 or chose to undergo SRT at or before Week 16). Two patients in each group decided to proceed with SRT.4
Interim Week 56 results
~91% of Patients Were No Longer Guideline Eligible for and Chose Not to Undergo Septal Reduction Therapy (SRT) in the Original CAMZYOS Group1
At Week 56, ~9% (n=5/56) in the original CAMZYOS group* and ~19% in the placebo-to-CAMZYOS crossover group† remained guideline eligible for or chose to proceed with SRT.1
This prespecified exploratory endpoint was not powered for significance, and statistic comparisons have not been made.
- ‡These patients were imputed as meeting SRT criteria.2
In the pivotal VALOR-HCM trial, -45.2 (28.5) mean change (SD) in Valsalva LVOT gradient with CAMZYOS vs 0.4 (29.7) mmHg with placebo from baseline to Week 16.5
Interim Week 56 results
CAMZYOS Demonstrated Consistent Reductions in Valsalva LVOT Gradient Through Week 56 in the Original CAMZYOS Group1
Exploratory endpoint: Mean change in Valsalva LVOT gradient from baseline to Week 561,3
These prespecified exploratory endpoints were not powered for significance, and statistical comparisons have not been made.
Important LVOT gradient thresholds6:
- An LVOT peak gradient of ≥30 mmHg is indicative of obstruction
- A resting or provoked LVOT gradient of ≥50 mmHg is the obstructive criteria for SRT in patients with drug-refractory symptoms
In the pivotal VALOR-HCM trial, 63% of patients (n=35/56) taking CAMZYOS improved by ≥1 NYHA class vs 21% (n=12/56) taking placebo group from baseline to Week 16. Approximately 7% of the randomized patients were NYHA class II and 93% were NYHA class III+ at baseline.4
Interim Week 56 results
CAMZYOS Demonstrated Symptom Improvement in ~93% of Patients in the Original CAMZYOS Group From Baseline to Week 561
NYHA class improvement at Week 56
At study baseline, approximately 6% of randomized patients were NYHA class II and 94% were NYHA class III+.1
This prespecified exploratory endpoint was not powered for significance, and statistical comparisons have not been made.
In the pivotal VALOR-HCM trial, patients taking CAMZYOS (n=56) had a mean change (SD) of 10 (16) in KCCQ-23-CSS (patient-reported total symptom score and physical limitations) vs. 2 (12) for Placebo (n=56); treatment difference (95% CI): 9 (5, 14), from Baseline to Week 16.4
Interim Week 56 results
CAMZYOS Demonstrated Consistent Improvements in KCCQ-23–CSS Scores in the Original CAMZYOS Group1§
Exploratory endpoint: Mean change in KCCQ-23–CSS from baseline to Week 561,3
This prespecified exploratory endpoint wasn’t powered for significance and statistical comparisons have not been made.
- §The KCCQ-23–CSS is derived from the TSS and PL score of the KCCQ-23. The Clinical Summary Score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing less severe symptoms and/or physical limitations.4
In the pivotal VALOR-HCM trial, the proportion of geometric mean ratio of NT-proBNP between the CAMZYOS group and placebo group was 0.33 (95% CI: 0.27, 0.42) from baseline to Week 16.4
Interim Week 56 results
Change in NT-proBNP from Baseline to Week 561
Exploratory endpoint: Median change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Week 561,3
These prespecified exploratory endpoints were not powered for significance and statistical comparisons have not been made. The clinical significance of the NT-proBNP findings is unknown.4
Interim Week 56 results
Changes in LAVI and LVMI for Both the Original CAMZYOS Group and Crossover Group With CAMZYOS1,3
These prespecified exploratory endpoints were not powered for significance and statistical comparisons have not been made.