Select baseline patient characteristics | ||
---|---|---|
Values in the table are mean ± SD, n (%) | CAMZYOS (n=123) | Placebo (n=128) |
Age, mean (SD), years | 59 (12.2) | 59 (11.8) |
Women, n (%) | 57 (46) | 45 (35) |
Race, n (%) | ||
White | 115 (94) | 114 (89) |
Black or African American | 1 (1) | 5 (4) |
American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 1 (1) |
Asian | 4 (3) | 2 (2) |
Unknown | 3 (2) | 6 (5) |
Background HCM treatment, n (%) | ||
Beta blocker Calcium channel blocker† |
94 (76) 25 (20) |
95 (74) 17 (13) |
NYHA class, n (%) | ||
Class II Class III |
88 (72) 35 (28) |
95 (74) 33 (26) |
pVO2 mean (SD), mL/kg/min | 18.9 (4.9) | 19.9 (4.9) |
LVOT gradient at baseline, mean (SD), mmHg | ||
Valsalva Postexercise‡ |
72 (32) 86 (34) |
74 (32) 84 (36) |
LVEF, mean (SD), (%) | 74 (6) | 74 (6) |
Critical cardiac history | ||
Atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 12 (10) | 23 (18) |
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, n (%) | 27 (22) | 29 (23) |
Prior invasive SRT, n (%) | 11 (9) | 8 (6) |
CAMZYOS® Study Designs for EXPLORER-HCM and EXPLORER-LTE
EXPLORER-HCM: Study Design
EXPLORER-HCM: A Groundbreaking Phase 3 Trial for Patients with NYHA Class II–III Obstructive HCM1
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 30-week trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of CAMZYOS vs placebo1
The efficacy and safety of CAMZYOS were evaluated in EXPLORER-HCM, a phase 3 trial that enrolled 251 adult patients.1
Select Inclusion Criteria1
- Symptomatic NYHA Class II-III obstructive HCM
- LVOT peak gradient ≥50 mmHg and LVEF ≥55%
Select Exclusion Criteria1,2
- Underwent SRT within 6 months prior to screening, or planned during study
- Treatment (within 14 days of screening) or planned treatment with disopyramide, ranolazine, or a combination of BBs and CCBs
Treatment2
- In the active treatment arm: 5 mg of CAMZYOS with opportunities for dose titration at Weeks 8 and 14 (based on patient response with Valsalva LVOT gradient and LVEF)
- During the treatment period, patients were evaluated every 2 to 4 weeks
Majority of patients (92%) were on background therapy with a BB or CCB CAMZYOS (n=119/123) | Placebo (n=112/128)2
The primary composite functional endpoint used 2 component parameters to assess exercise capacity and impact on patients’ symptoms1
Exercise capacity was assessed with pVO2, an objective measure of peak oxygen consumption during CPET3*
Symptoms were assessed with NYHA class, a subjective measure of symptom burden3
The proportion of patients who achieved either of the following changes from baseline to Week 301:
≥1.5 mL/kg/min improvement in pVO2
AND
≥1 NYHA class improvement
—OR—
≥3.0 mL/kg/min improvement in pVO2
AND
No worsening in NYHA class
Secondary endpoints (from baseline to Week 30)1,2
- Change in postexercise LVOT peak gradient
- Change in pVO2
- Proportion of patients with ≥1 NYHA class improvement
- Change in KCCQ-23–CSS
- Change in HCMSQ-SoB
All assessments for secondary endpoints were performed and Type 1 error was controlled in hierarchical order (sequence as indicated above) upon achieving significance in the primary endpoint (with two-tailed P<0.05 required to proceed). Data based on all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Model-estimated least-square mean differences were reported for continuous variable. Missing NYHA class data at Week 30 were imputed with the Week 26 value in the case of NYHA response. Patients with a nonevaluable primary endpoint and NYHA secondary endpoint were considered as nonresponders. LVOT gradient, pVO2, KCCQ-23—CSS, and HCMSQ-SoB were analyzed with all available gradient (pVO2) or mixed-effect model for repeated measurements (KCCQ-23–CSS, HCMSQ-SoB).2
* | Type of exercise testing used in EXPLORER-HCM included either a treadmill or a bicycle.3 |
BB=beta blocker; CCB=calcium channel blocker; CI=confidence interval; CPET=Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing; HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HCMSQ-SoB=Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Symptom Questionnaire Shortness of Breath; KCCQ-23–CSS=Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-23–Clinical Summary Score; LTE=long-term extension; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; NYHA=New York Heart; Association; SRT=septal reduction therapy.
Select baseline patient characteristics in EXPLORER-HCM1,2
† | Nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.2 |
‡ | Data missing for one patient in the CAMZYOS group and one patient in the placebo group.2 |
SD=standard deviation.
Study procedures used in EXPLORER-HCM to determine the efficacy and safety of CAMZYOS
EXPLORER-LTE: Study Design
EXPLORER-LTE: Interim Readout at ~3.5 Years from a 5-Year, Long-Term Extension Trial4
- EXPLORER-LTE is one of two cohorts from MAVA-LTE: a single-arm, open-label, ongoing extension of the phase 3 EXPLORER-HCM study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CAMZYOS4
- 231 of 251 patients from the pivotal trial enrolled in the long-term extension after an 8-week washout period4
The EXPLORER-LTE cohort of the MAVA-LTE trial sought to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CAMZYOS starting at 5 mg in eligible adults who completed the EXPLORER-HCM trial. The EXPLORER-LTE cohort (n=231) is a single-arm without an active comparator.1,4
EXPLORER-LTE objectives evaluated the long-term effect of CAMZYOS on5:
Primary objective: safety and tolerability
Secondary objectives: changes in NYHA class, LVOT gradients at rest and with Valsalva, and LVEF
Exploratory objectives: changes in NT-proBNP and measures of left ventricle filling
STUDY LIMITATIONS
- These data are not included in the CAMZYOS US Full Prescribing Information. Caution should be used in interpreting the data as the data were not statistically tested for significance, but are only descriptive in nature
- There are limitations with the data, including decreased sample size and different continuation rates based on the continued involvement of responders and attrition of nonresponders
- MAVA-LTE, including the EXPLORER-LTE cohort, is a single-arm study without an active comparator; patients in EXPLORER-LTE were part of either the CAMZYOS or placebo group in EXPLORER-HCM; therefore, baseline characteristics for EXPLORER-LTE changed due to time and consolidation of both arms to one cohort
- The EXPLORER-LTE cohort of MAVA-LTE included 14 patients who were NYHA Class I at screening. These patients were included in the EXPLORER-HCM trial; 5 had received CAMZYOS, and 9 were in the placebo group
Study design for EXPLORER-LTE cohort4,6
Swipe left for full chart
§ | This is not consistent with the current approved dosing schedule per the US Full Prescribing Information.8 |
EOS=end of study; EOT=end of treatment; NT-proBNP=N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide; QD=once daily.
Select Patient Baseline¶ Characteristics for EXPLORER-LTE4
Characteristic | EXPLORER-LTE cohort (n=123) |
---|---|
Age, mean (SD), years | 60.0 (11.9) |
Female, n (%) | 91 (39.4) |
Background HCM treatment, n (%)
|
176 (76.2) 38 (16.5) |
NYHA class, n (%)
|
14 (6.1) 152 (65.8) 65 (28.1) |
NT-proBNP, median (IQR), ng/L | 766.0 (323.0, 1593.0) [n=230] |
LVOT gradient at baseline, mean (SD), mmHg
|
48.3 (31.9) 69.5 (33.3) [n=228] |
LVEF, mean (SD), % | 74.0 (5.9) [n=230] |
Time on study, median (range), weeks | 166.1 (6.0–228.1) |
¶Baseline is defined as last non-missing measurement before the first dose of CAMZYOS in MAVA-LTE.4
IQR=interquartile range.
References:
- CAMZYOS [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025.
- Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, et al; EXPLORER-HCM study investigators. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10253):759-769. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31792-X
- Ho CY, Day SM, Ashley EA, et al; SHaRe Investigators Genotype and lifetime burden of disease in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: insights from the Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry (SHaRe). Circulation. 2018;138(14):1387-1398. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033200
- Garcia-Pavia P, Oręziak A, Masri A, et al. Long-term effect of mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(47):5071-5083. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae579
- Rader F, Oręziak A, Choudhury L, et al. Mavacamten treatment for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: interim results from the MAVA-LTE study, EXPLORER-LTE cohort. JACC Heart Fail. 2024;12(1):164-177. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2023.09.028
- Garcia-Pavia P, Oręziak A, Masri A, et al. Long-term effects of mavacamten treatment in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM): updated cumulative analysis of the EXPLORER cohort of MAVA-long-term extension (LTE) study up to 120 weeks. Presented at: ESC 2023. Oral presentation 835382.
- Garcia-Pavia P, Oręziak A, Masri A, et al. Long-term effect of mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2024 [supplementary appendix]. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae579
- Argulian E, Sherrid MV, Messerli FH. Misconceptions and facts about hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Med. 2016;129(2):148-152. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.07.035
3500-US-2500554 09/25