Skip to main content

Now Approved in Pediatric Patients Weighing ≥30 kg With Symptomatic oHCM1

Explore this page:    |    Study Design    |    LVOT Gradient    |    NYHA Class    |   Pediatric Safety

CAMZYOS Pediatric Dosing: To find information on Dosing & Administration, please see US Full Prescribing Information, including Boxed Warning. The CAMZYOS 1-mg dose strength is anticipated to be available in mid-December 2026.

Study Design: SCOUT-HCM2,3

The efficacy and safety of CAMZYOS were evaluated in SCOUT-HCM, a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients aged 12 to 17 years with symptomatic NYHA Class II–III obstructive HCM. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a starting dose of CAMZYOS (n=23) based on weight (2.5 mg in patients 35 to <45 kg; 5 mg in patients ≥45 kg) with potential titrations to once-daily doses of 1, 2.5, 5, 10, or 15 mg; or placebo (n=21) for 28 weeks. Enrolled patients had LVEF ≥60%, Valsalva LVOT peak gradient ≥30 mmHg and a maximal gradient ≥50 mmHg at rest or with provocation, and background obstructive HCM therapy with a beta blocker, calcium channel blocker, disopyramide, or combinations was permitted. Dose adjustment was allowed at Weeks 5, 9, 12, and 24 based on echocardiographic assessments of Valsalva LVOT gradient and LVEF.

Patients were excluded for HCM phenocopies (Noonan's Syndrome, Fabry's Disease), recent (last 6 months) LVEF <50%, planned escalation of HCM therapy or cardiac intervention, or treatment with moderate to strong CYP2C19 inhibitors or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (within 14 days before screening).

The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Valsalva LVOT gradient at Week 28. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to Week 28 in resting LVOT gradient, post-exercise peak LVOT gradient, maximal LV wall thickness, E/e′, and HCMSQ-SoB domain score. Additional secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving an increase in pVO₂, resting or Valsalva LVOT gradient <30 mmHg at Week 28, ≥1 NYHA class improvement, or ≥1 mitral regurgitation grade improvement. Secondary and exploratory endpoints were summarized descriptively with estimates of between-group differences and 95% confidence intervals, which were not adjusted for multiplicity and should not be interpreted as formal hypothesis testing. Safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and a decrease in LVEF to <50%.

At baseline, 83% and 86% of patients were receiving beta blockers, 13% and 10% were receiving calcium channel blockers, and 17% and 24% were receiving disopyramide, in the CAMZYOS and placebo groups, respectively. Mean LVEF was 69.0% in the CAMZYOS group and 67.4% in the placebo group; mean Valsalva LVOT gradient was 78 mmHg in the CAMZYOS group and 81 mmHg in the placebo group.

CYP=cytochrome P450; E/e′=ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity; HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HCMSQ-SoB=Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Symptom Questionnaire–Shortness-of-Breath domain score; LV=left ventricle; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; NYHA=New York Heart Association; pVO2=peak oxygen consumption.

Reducing LVOT Obstruction Objectively Marks Therapeutic Benefit in Obstructive HCM in Adolescents4

Primary Endpoint: CAMZYOS is the first FDA-approved treatment in pediatric patients (12–17 years) proven to reduce obstruction as measured by Valsalva LVOT gradient vs placebo at Week 281,2

SCOUT-HCM primary endpoint: Mean change in Valsalva LVOT (SD) gradient from baseline to Week 281,2

CAMZYOS achieved: -49.4 (42.6) mmHg at Week 28 in Valsalva LVOT gradient vs -1.8 (37.8) mmHg for placebo; least squares mean difference:
-48.0 mmHg (95% CI: -67.7, -28.3); P<0.0001

The results for secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints were summarized descriptively with estimates of between-group differences and 95% 
confidence intervals, which were not adjusted for multiplicity and should not be interpreted as formal hypothesis testing.

Secondary efficacy endpoints: Mean change in resting and postexercise LVOT gradients from baseline to Week 281,2

  • Reductions [SD] in mean resting LVOT gradient were observed for CAMZYOS (-41 [35] mmHg) and placebo (+5.3 [23] mmHg) patients
  • Patients achieved reductions of -31.2 mmHg (95% CI: -46.3, -16.1) in postexercise LVOT gradient with CAMZYOS vs +10.5 mmHg (95% CI: -5.5, 26.6) with placebo

Secondary endpoint: 65% of patients (n=15/23) receiving CAMZYOS and 5% of patients (n=1/21) receiving placebo were no longer obstructed (resting or post-Valsalva)* at Week 285

*Unobstructed defined as maximal LVOT gradient (resting or Valsalva) of <30 mmHg.5
CI=confidence interval; FDA=US Food and Drug Administration; HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; SD=standard deviation.

NYHA Class Is a Subjective Measure of a Patient's Functional Capacity (Symptoms)6

Secondary Endpoint: Reductions of ≥1 NYHA class from baseline to Week 28 were evaluated in pediatric patients (12–17 years) taking CAMZYOS5

The results for secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints were summarized descriptively with estimates of between-group differences and 95% confidence intervals, which were not adjusted for multiplicity and should not be interpreted as formal hypothesis testing.

Missing NYHA class at Week 28 was imputed using available data from Week 23. If multiple NYHA class records existed within the Week 23 analysis window, then the latest record was used. After imputation, participants whose response status at Week 28 was still missing were classified as nonresponders.5 
NYHA=New York Heart Association.

No New Adverse Reactions Were Seen in Adolescents Receiving CAMZYOS1,2

CAMZYOS demonstrated a safety profile in SCOUT-HCM consistent with prior studies in adults1,2

LVEF remained ≥50% in all patients in both groups

*In one patient, an inappropriate shock was delivered by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator that led to an interruption in treatment during the patient’s hospitalization.2
LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction.

References:

  1. CAMZYOS [package insert] Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2026.
  2. Rossano JW, Canter C, Wolf CM, et al. Mavacamten in adolescents with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2026;395(4):362-373.
  3. Rossano J, Canter C, Wolf C, et al. Mavacamten in symptomatic adolescent patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: design of the phase 3 SCOUT-HCM trial. Am Heart J. 2026;292:107283.
  4. Ommen SR, Ho CY, Asif IM, et al. AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149:e1239–e1311. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001250
  5. Rossano JW, Canter C, Wolf CM, et al. Mavacamten in adolescents with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2026;395(4):362-373 [supplementary appendix].
  6. Ho CY, Olivotto I, Jacoby D, et al. Study design and rationale of EXPLORER-HCM: evaluation of mavacamten in adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(6):e006853.


3500-US-2600496   09/26

© 2026 MyoKardia, Inc., a Bristol Myers Squibb company. 
CAMZYOS® and the CAMZYOS and MyCAMZYOS Logos are trademarks of MyoKardia, Inc.

3500-US-2400621   04/25

This site is intended for U.S. Healthcare Professionals only.