Discover the Impact of CAMZYOS® Over Time Supported by ~3.5 Years of Data1,2

Explore this page:    |    Primary Endpoint    |    LVOT Gradient    |    NYHA Class    |   Cardiac Biomarker: NT-proBNP

Primary Endpoint (EXPLORER-HCM)

2x as Many Patients on CAMZYOS Increased Their Exercise Capacity (pVO2) and Saw Improvement or No Worsening in Symptoms (NYHA Classification) vs Placebo1

Patients achieving the primary composite endpoint at Week 301 | Difference (95% CI): 19% (9, 30); P=0.0005

Primary composite endpoint definition1,3

  • Exercise capacity was assessed with pVO2, an objective measure of peak oxygen consumption during CPET3,4*
  • Symptoms were assessed with NYHA class, a subjective measure of symptom burden1
  • The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved either of the following changes from baseline to Week 303:
    • ≥1.5 mL/kg/min improvement in pVO2 AND ≥1 NYHA class improvement OR
    • ≥3.0 mL/kg/min improvement in pVO2 AND no worsening in NYHA class
* Type of exercise testing used in EXPLORER-HCM included either a treadmill or a bicycle.2
CI=confidence interval; CPET=cardiopulmonary exercise testing; NYHA=New York Heart Association; pVO2=peak oxygen consumption.

Exploratory Endpoint: CAMZYOS Reduced Valsalva LVOT Gradient at Week 30 With Results Sustained at ~3.5 Years2,4

Patients Achieved Reductions in Mean Provoked Valsalva LVOT Gradient by First Clinical Visit (Week 4)* That Were Sustained Through Week 304

Secondary endpoint: Mean change in postexercise LVOT peak gradient from baseline to Week 301
-47 mmHg mean change vs placebo (-10 mmHg) | Difference (95% Cl): -35 mmHg (-43, 28); P<0.0001

Exploratory endpoint: 57% of patients (n=64/113) on CAMZYOS had a postexercise LVOT gradient <30 mmHg 
vs 7%
(n=8/114) on placebo at Week 304

The prespecified exploratory endpoints were not powered for significance, and statistical comparisons have not been made.

EXPLORER-HCM exploratory endpoint: Valsalva LVOT gradient from baseline to Week 301

  • The mean (SD) changes in Valsalva LVOT gradient were -49 (34) mmHg for the CAMZYOS group and -12 (31) mmHg for the placebo group

EXPLORER-LTE exploratory objective: Valsalva LVOT gradient from baseline to Week 1802

  • The mean (SD) change in Valsalva LVOT gradient was -55 (34) mmHg

Obstruction is defined as LVOT peak gradient ≥30 mmHg with or without provocation5

  • 91% of patients (n=81/89) who reached Week 180 no longer had obstruction2
  • Overall, 83% (n=191) achieved a reduced Valsalva LVOT gradient of 
≤30 mmHg, or below obstructive levels at the time of analysis (data cutoff)2
* Week 4 marks the first scheduled assessment of LVOT gradient following the initiation of CAMZYOS.1
EXPLORER-LTE is a single-arm extension trial that does not include placebo.2

CI=confidence interval; HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; SD=standard deviation.

Impact to Cardiac Structure and Function at Week 30 Was Sustained at ~3.5 Years1,2,6,7

EXPLORER-HCM exploratory endpoint: Mean change in LVMI from baseline to Week 301,6

The mean (SD) change in LVMI was -7.4 (17.8) g/m2 for CAMZYOS and +8.9 (15.3) g/m2 in the placebo group.

EXPLORER-HCM exploratory endpoint: Mean change in LAVI from baseline to Week 301,6

The mean (SD) change in LAVI was -7.5 (7.8) mL/m2 for CAMZYOS and no change 
[-0.1 (8.7) mL/m2] in the placebo group.

EXPLORER-LTE exploratory endpoint: Mean change in LAVI from baseline to Week 1802,7

The mean (SD) change in LAVI was -5.5 (9.7) mL/m2 (n=62).

Prespecified exploratory endpoints were not powered for significance, and statistical comparisons have not been made.
The clinical significance of these findings is unknown.1
Echos provided by a US HCP.
HCP=healthcare provider; LAVI=left atrial volume index; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; LVMI=let ventricular mass index; SD=standard deviation.

CAMZYOS Improved NYHA Class at Week 30 With Results Sustained at ~3.5 Years1,2

These data were used to calculate the secondary endpoint related to NYHA class but were exploratory in nature and not evaluated for significance to compare between the treatment groups.4,8

At baseline, approximately 73% of patients were NYHA Class II and 27% were NYHA Class III.1

EXPLORER-HCM NYHA data4,9:

At Week 30, 42% (n=52) of patients taking CAMZYOS were Class II and 7% (n=8) were Class III vs 58% (n=74) and 20% (n=25) in the placebo arm, respectively.4,9

EXPLORER-LTE NYHA data2,10:

  • 37% (n=10/27) of patients who were NYHA Class III at baseline and reached Week 180 improved by 2 classes
  • 21% of patients experienced no change in NYHA class
  • One patient worsened from NYHA Class II to NYHA Class III at Week 180 and had ongoing atrial fibrillation unrelated to CAMZYOS during this time

Of the patients (n=95) at the Week 180 visit2:

63 (66%) were NYHA Class I
29 (31%) were NYHA Class II
3 (3%) were NYHA Class III

* Evaluation of symptoms via NYHA classification.4
EXPLORER-LTE is a single-arm extension trial that does not include placebo.2
Baseline is defined as last non-missing measurement before the first dose of CAMZYOS in MAVA-LTE.2

 BL=baseline; CI=confidence interval; NYHA=New York Heart Association.

Exploratory Endpoint: 80% Reduction in NT-proBNP at Week 30 With 
Results Sustained at ~3.5 Years1,2,4

NT-proBNP is a biomarker that can be used to measure cardiac stress. Elevated levels can be associated with negative outcomes in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM2,4

Exploratory endpoint: Mean change in NT‑proBNP from baseline to 
Week 30 (EXPLORER‑HCM)1

Proportion of the geometric mean ratio between the groups was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.17, 0.24).

* EXPLORER-LTE is a single-arm extension trial that does not include placebo.2


Exploratory objective: Median change in NT‑proBNP from baseline to Week 180 (EXPLORER‑LTE)2

The median (IQR) change in NT-proBNP (n=88) was -562 (-1162.5, -209) ng/L.

Normalized NT-proBNP is defined as <124 ng/L2

At baseline in EXPLORER-LTE, 10% (n=22/230) of patients presented with an NT‑proBNP concentration of <124 ng/L, indicative of normal range. With continued CAMZYOS treatment, the proportion of patients with NT‑proBNP levels in the normal range increased to 28% at Week 4 (n=62/218) and 54% at Week 180 (n=50/93).

The prespecified exploratory endpoints were not powered for significance, and statistical comparisons have not been made.
The clinical significance of the NT-proBNP findings is unknown.1
HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; IQR=interquartile range; NT-proBNP=N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide; NYHA=New York Heart Association.

References:

  1. CAMZYOS [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025.
  2. Garcia-Pavia P, Oreziak A, Masri A, et al. Long-term effect of mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(47):5071-5083.
  3. Ho CY, Olivotto I, Jacoby D, et al. Study design and rationale of EXPLORER-HCM: evaluation of mavacamten in adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(6):e006853.
  4. Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, et al. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10253):759-769.
  5. Ommen SR, Ho CY, Asif IM, et al. 2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149(23):e1239-e1311.
  6. Hegde SM, Lester SJ, Solomon SD, et al. Effect of mavacamten on echocardiographic features in symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(25):2518-2532.
  7. Garcia-Pavia P, Oręziak A, Masri A, et al. Long-term effect of mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(47):5071-5083 [supplementary appendix].
  8. Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, et al. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10253):759-769 [supplementary appendix].
  9. Data on file. BMS-REF-MAVA-002. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2021.
  10. Data on file. BMS-REF-MAVA-0076. Princeton, NJ; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2024.


3500-US-2600154   05/26

© 2026 MyoKardia, Inc., a Bristol Myers Squibb company. 
CAMZYOS® and the CAMZYOS and MyCAMZYOS Logos are trademarks of MyoKardia, Inc.

3500-US-2400621   04/25

This site is intended for U.S. Healthcare Professionals only.