Skip to main content

Safety Profile Established in EXPLORER-HCM Remained Consistent Across EXPLORER-LTE1-4

Explore this page:    |    SCOUT-HCM Safety    |    EXPLORER-HCM & LTE Safety    |    VALOR-HCM & LTE Safety

No New Adverse Reactions Were Seen in Adolescents Receiving CAMZYOS1,5

CAMZYOS demonstrated a safety profile in SCOUT-HCM consistent with prior studies in adults1,5

LVEF remained ≥50% in all patients in both groups5

* In the CAMZYOS group, 1 patient had two episodes of syncope (previous history of presyncope), and 1 patient had an inappropriate shock delivery by an ICD; in the placebo group, 1 patient had chest pain, and 1 patient had depression with suicidal ideation.5
† In one patient, an inappropriate shock was delivered by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator that led to an interruption in treatment during the patient’s hospitalization.5
  ICD=implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction.

Mean LVEF Remained Above 60% at All Trial Visits in EXPLORER‑HCM
With Results Sustained at ~5 Years1,2,4

LVEF reductions were reversible and affected a limited number of patients in EXPLORER-HCM1

  • 7 (6%) patients in the CAMZYOS group and 2 (2%) patients in the placebo group experienced reversible reductions in LVEF <50% (median 48%: range 35%-49%) while on treatment
  • In 3 of 7 patients on CAMZYOS and 1 of 2 patients in the placebo group, these reductions were asymptomatic
  • In all 7 patients treated with CAMZYOS, LVEF recovered following interruption of CAMZYOS

Effects on systolic function in EXPLORER‑HCM1

  • Mean (SD) absolute change from baseline in LVEF was -4% (8) in the CAMZYOS group and 0% (7) in the placebo group over 30 weeks

Effects on systolic function in EXPLORER‑LTE

LVEF reductions were reversible after treatment interruption and affected a limited number of patients in EXPLORER-LTE4

  • 27 (11.7%) patients experienced transient reductions in LVEF <50% through Week 252
  • Of these, 17 (7.4% of total population) had an LVEF between 40 to <50%; EAIR of 1.7/100 PY
  • 9 (3.9%) patients had an LVEF between 30% to <40%, and 1 (0.4%) patient had an LVEF <30%, with EAIRs of 0.8 and 0.1 events/100 PY, respectively
*EXPLORER-LTE is a single-arm extension trial that does not include placebo.3

BL=baseline; EAIR=exposure-adjusted incidence rate; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction; SD=standard deviation; PY=patient years.

The Safety Profile of CAMZYOS Is Consistent and Sustained Through
~5 Years of Clinical Evaluation in EXPLORER-LTE1,4

  • TEAEs of clinical interest occurred in 177 (77%) patients, with an EAIR of 36.3 events/100PY, and included†#:
    • AF§ in 37 (16%) patients, with an EAIR of 3.8 events/100PY
    • Ejection fraction decreasedII in 16 (7%) patients, with an EAIR of 1.5 events/100PY
    • Cardiac failure in 13 (6%) patients, with EAIR of 1.2 events/100PY
  • ≥1 drug-related serious TEAE occurred in 12 (5%) patients, with an EAIR of 1.1 events/100PY**
* Syncope (0.8%) was the only adverse drug reaction leading to discontinuation in patients receiving CAMZYOS.1
† Defined as TEAEs related to major adverse cardiovascular events, AF, ventricular arrhythmias, syncope/pre-syncope, cardiac failure, hypotension, and QTcF prolongation.4
‡Includes cardiac-related serious TEAEs of clinical interest reported in ≥1% of patients.4
§Any AF event.4
||TEAEs of “ejection fraction decreased” were recorded independently of instances of site-read LVEF <50%.4
Owing to cardiac arrest (n=2), bacterial endocarditis (n=1), acute myocardial infarction (n=1), intracerebral hemorrhage due to arteriovenous malformation (n=1), large cell lymphoma (n=1), progression of liver metastases with cholangitis and new-onset biliary dilatation (n=1), and unknown (n=1); all unrelated to treatment.4
#Includes cardiac-related TEAEs of clinical interest reported in ≥1% of patients.4

**Ejection fraction decreased (n=5), cardiac failure (n=4), AF (n=1), atrial flutter (n=1), ventricular dysfunction (n=1).4

AF=atrial fibrillation; EAIR=exposure-adjusted incidence rate; EOS=end of study; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction; QTcF=QT interval corrected using Fridericia’s formula; PY=patient years; TEAE=treatment-emergent adverse event.

In SRT-Eligible Adult Patients, Mean LVEF Remained Within Normal Limits and >60% at 
All Trial Visits7

Mean LVEF remained within normal limits 
in both groups (50%–70%)6,7

  • At Week 128, the total change from baseline in mean LVEF was -4.8% (95% CI: -6.2 to -3.5) for the total population (N=108)7
  • Through Week 128, 15 patients (13.9%) experienced LVEF <50%7
  • There were no new adverse reactions identified in VALOR-HCM at Week 161

CI=confidence interval; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction; SRT=septal reduction therapy.

The Safety of CAMZYOS Was Consistent and Sustained in SRT-Eligible Adult Patients Through ~2.5 Years7,8

LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction; PY=patient years; SRT=septal reduction therapy.

References:

  1. CAMZYOS [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2026.
  2. Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, et al. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10253):759-769.
  3. Garcia-Pavia P, Oreziak A, Masri A, et al. Long-term effect of mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(47):5071-5083.
  4. Owens AT, Oręziak A, Masri A, et al. Safety and efficacy of treatment with mavacamten for up to 5 years in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: final results from MAVA-LTE. Oral presentation at ESC 2026; August 28-31, 2026; Munich, Germany.
  5. Rossano JW, Canter C, Wolf CM, et al. Mavacamten in adolescents with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2026;395(4):362-373.
  6. American College of Cardiology. ACC Heart Failure Toolkit. 2014.
  7. Desai MY, Wolski K, Owens A, et al. Mavacamten in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy referred for septal reduction: Week 128 results From VALOR-HCM. Circulation. 2025;151(19):1378-1390.
  8. Desai MY, Owens A, Geske JB, et al. Myosin inhibition in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy referred for septal reduction therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(2):95-108.


© 2026 MyoKardia, Inc., a Bristol Myers Squibb company. 
CAMZYOS® and the CAMZYOS and MyCAMZYOS Logos are trademarks of MyoKardia, Inc.


3500-US-2600359   10/26

This site is intended for U.S. Healthcare Professionals only.