Skip to main content

Discover the Impact of CAMZYOS® Over Time Supported by ~5 Years of Data1,2

Explore this page:    |    Primary Endpoint    |    LVOT Gradient    |    NYHA Class    |   Cardiac Biomarker: NT-proBNP

Primary Endpoint (EXPLORER-HCM)

2x as Many Patients on CAMZYOS Increased Their Exercise Capacity (pVO2) and Saw Improvement or No Worsening in Symptoms (NYHA Classification) vs Placebo1

Patients achieving the primary composite endpoint at Week 301 | Difference (95% CI): 19% (9, 30); P=0.0005

Primary composite endpoint definition1,3

  • Exercise capacity was assessed with pVO2, an objective measure of peak oxygen consumption during CPET*3,4
  • Symptoms were assessed with NYHA class, a subjective measure of symptom burden1
  • The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved either of the following changes from baseline to Week 303:
    • ≥1.5 mL/kg/min improvement in pVO2 AND ≥1 NYHA class improvement OR
    • ≥3.0 mL/kg/min improvement in pVO2 AND no worsening in NYHA class
*Type of exercise testing used in EXPLORER-HCM included either a treadmill or a bicycle.4
CI=confidence interval; CPET=cardiopulmonary exercise testing; NYHA=New York Heart Association; pVO2=peak oxygen consumption.

Reducing LVOT obstruction is an objective measure of response in obstructive HCM1,5

Exploratory endpoint: CAMZYOS achieved reductions in Valsalva LVOT at Week 30 that were maintained through ~5 years1,2

Secondary endpoint: Mean change in postexercise LVOT peak gradient from baseline to Week 301
-47 mmHg mean change vs placebo (-10 mmHg) | Difference (95% Cl): -35 mmHg (-43, 28); P<0.0001

Exploratory endpoint: 57% of patients (n=64/113) on CAMZYOS had a postexercise LVOT gradient <30 mmHg 
vs 7%
(n=8/114) on placebo at Week 304

The prespecified exploratory endpoints were not powered for significance, and statistical comparisons have not been made.

EXPLORER-HCM exploratory endpoint: Valsalva LVOT gradient from baseline to Week 301

  • The mean (SD) changes in Valsalva LVOT gradient were -49 (34) mmHg for the CAMZYOS group and -12 (31) mmHg for the placebo group
  • Reductions in Valsalva LVOT gradient were seen as early as the first clinical visit (Week 4), and were maintained throughout the study2

EXPLORER-LTE exploratory objective: Valsalva LVOT gradient from baseline to Week 2522

  • The mean (95% CI) change in Valsalva LVOT gradient was -56 (-60.8, -50.4) mmHg2

Obstruction is defined as LVOT peak gradient ≥30 mmHg with or without provocation5

*EXPLORER-LTE is a single-arm extension trial that does not include placebo.2
Week 4 marks the first scheduled assessment of LVOT gradient following the initiation of CAMZYOS.1

CI=confidence interval; HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; SD=standard deviation.

Impact to Cardiac Structure and Function Was Evaluated at ~5 Years1,2,6

Prespecified exploratory endpoints were not powered for significance, and statistical comparisons have not been made.
The clinical significance of these findings is unknown.1

EXPLORER-HCM exploratory endpoint: Mean change in LVMI from baseline to Week 301,6

  • The mean (SD) change in LVMI was -7.4 (17.8) g/m2 for CAMZYOS and +8.9 (15.3) g/m2 in the placebo group

EXPLORER-HCM exploratory endpoint: Mean change in LAVI from baseline to Week 301,6

  • The mean (SD) change in LAVI was -7.5 (7.8) mL/m2 for CAMZYOS and no change 
[-0.1 (8.7) mL/m2] in the placebo group

EXPLORER-LTE exploratory endpoint: Mean change in LAVI from baseline to Week 2522

The mean (95% CI) change in LAVI was -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6) mL/m2 (n=181).2

Echos provided by a US HCP.
HCP=healthcare provider; LAVI=left atrial volume index; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; LVMI=let ventricular mass index; SD=standard deviation.

Improvements in NYHA class is a subjective measure of a patient’s symptoms3

CAMZYOS achieved reductions in NYHA class by Week 30 that were sustained through ~5 years1,2,4

EXPLORER-HCM NYHA data4,7:

  • At baseline, approximately 73% of patients were NYHA Class II and 27% were NYHA Class III1
  • At Week 30, 42% (n=52) of patients taking CAMZYOS were Class II and 7% (n=8) were Class III vs 58% (n=74) and 20% (n=25) in the placebo arm, respectively4,9

EXPLORER-LTE NYHA data2:

  • 70% of patients taking CAMZYOS improved by ≥1 NYHA class at ~5 years
  • 59% of patients taking CAMZYOS reached NYHA Class I (asymptomatic) at ~5 years

Of the patients (n=184) at the Week 252 visit2:

  • 109 (59%) were NYHA Class I
  • 72 (39%) were NYHA Class II
  • 3 (2%) were NYHA Class III
*Evaluation of symptoms via NYHA classification.4

 BL=baseline; CI=confidence interval; NYHA=New York Heart Association.

NT-proBNP is a biomarker that can be used to measure cardiac stress, with elevations potentially associated with negative outcomes1,4

80% greater reduction with CAMZYOS vs placebo at Week 30, with results sustained at ~5 years1,2,4

While these exploratory endpoints were prespecified, they were not powered for significance.
The clinical significance of these findings is unknown.1

Exploratory endpoint: Change in NT‑proBNP from baseline to
Week 30 (EXPLORER‑HCM)1

Proportion of the geometric mean ratio between the groups was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.17, 0.24).

*EXPLORER-LTE is a single-arm extension trial that does not include placebo.2


Exploratory objective: Median change in NT‑proBNP from baseline to Week 252 (EXPLORER‑LTE)2

The median (IQR) change in NT-proBNP (n=154) was ‑563 (-1213, -124) ng/L.

Normalized NT-proBNP is defined as <124 ng/L2

HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; IQR=interquartile range; NT-proBNP=N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide; NYHA=New York Heart Association.

References:

  1. CAMZYOS [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025.
  2. Owens AT, Oręziak A, Masri A, et al. Safety and efficacy of treatment with mavacamten for up to 5 years in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: final results from MAVA-LTE. Oral presentation at ESC 2026; August 28-31, 2026; Munich, Germany.
  3. Ho CY, Olivotto I, Jacoby D, et al. Study design and rationale of EXPLORER-HCM: evaluation of mavacamten in adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(6):e006853.
  4. Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, et al. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10253):759-769.
  5. Ommen SR, Ho CY, Asif IM, et al. 2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149(23):e1239-e1311.
  6. Hegde SM, Lester SJ, Solomon SD, et al. Effect of mavacamten on echocardiographic features in symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(25):2518-2532.
  7. Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, et al. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10253):759-769 [supplementary appendix].


3500-US-2600358   09/26

© 2026 MyoKardia, Inc., a Bristol Myers Squibb company. 
CAMZYOS® and the CAMZYOS and MyCAMZYOS Logos are trademarks of MyoKardia, Inc.

3500-US-2400621   04/25

This site is intended for U.S. Healthcare Professionals only.